flemmings: (Default)
flemmings ([personal profile] flemmings) wrote2012-12-29 09:48 pm

Assorted

1. Snow is for the young. It makes my feet hurt, my ankles hurt, my knees scream, and for some reason gives me cramps on the inside of my thighs the way nothing has done since riding a horse when I was 11. And I walked in it all today and all yesterday, and will be walking in it for quite some time to come. The only good thing about snow is being able to shovel it away. And I can't do that because a very little careful cleaning makes my neck nerves twinge warningly. So I shall be sliding over many people's churned-up slush as well.

2. The BBC Sherlock is marvellous for taking me Elsewhere. I have no idea why this should be so. I'm a little discomfited that it's also made the original impossible to read. Maybe the taste for Holmes will come back when the taste of Cumberbatch has left my brain.

3. It's been years since I've read fanfic in quantity. Partly I haven't had fandoms that needed it. If I want more Pratchett, say, Pratchett himself provides. Or else I've wanted it-- 100 Demons, say-- but practically no one was writing. But now I've been through AO3's collection of Rivers of London fics because I very much want more Peter, and Aaronovitch isn't providing it fast enough, and other people are. The quality varies, but I remember now what the inescapable lure of doujinshi was, ten and twenty years ago. More of these marvellous people, and maybe someone else's take on what they're all about. Most satisfying.

Which reminds me that I should see if anyone wrote Points fic. Which is a case in, um, point. It exists, but to date hasn't scratched whatever particular itch I have. More doesn't do it with the Points, alas. New and useful is what I want, and generally what I've seen hasn't been either. No, actually, I want more settei-- more background-- and that's not something fanfic is good at providing.

[identity profile] i-am-zan.livejournal.com 2012-12-30 11:30 am (UTC)(link)
Yup, definitely for the young. *huggs* for the pains, the slush and stuff.

I love BBC's SHerlock. Me and the little boy has watched it. And thankfully it hasn't put the boy off reading Doyle. He has read some of the Adventures and the Memoirs. (I joked with him that since daddy's -maternal- granny was a Scottish Doyle, that you never could know but he could be a secret long lost descendent of his. ^_^)


Anyway yes .. ... may the new year dawn bright and beautiful, and with less snow and slush.

Much love , zan

[identity profile] flemmings.livejournal.com 2012-12-30 06:37 pm (UTC)(link)
We all have our natural trials to bear. I'll take snow and slush over daily thunderstorms and smoke storms from Malaysia. ^_^ Though in an ideal world, we'd have neither; or rather, people would shovel their walks and not burn their fields.

Err- isn't Sherlock a bit over a grade-schooler's head? I had to watch it with subtitles on and a lot still went past me. Doyle of course is perfectly accessible...

Happy new year to you and yours as well.

[identity profile] yumiyoshi.livejournal.com 2012-12-30 03:27 pm (UTC)(link)
BBC Sherlock, for all its problems, is photographed in a way as to make it kind of hyper-real and really, really beautiful. I think that's what makes it very otherworldly, even though it's set in our world. Also, since it's Sherlock Holmes, which has been a collective hallucination for a hundred years, there is a sense of "THIS is Sherlock Holmes' London" and it's just a blink away from our London.

[identity profile] flemmings.livejournal.com 2012-12-30 06:49 pm (UTC)(link)
Sherlock's London looks much more like 'my' London than Holmes' London, if you follow. The mythologized latter is all pea soupers and gas lamps and rain. The former is much cleaner than that or my own remembered London, but my version is forty years old. (IRA bombs and greyness and infra-blue cold and never enough hot water, is 70s London. Tatty, basically.) I'd assumed prosperity had brightened things up a bit. If it looks other-worldly to you, well, you've been there a lot more recently than I.

What Sherlock is for me is a lovely background to Aaronovitch. It does look too pretty to be Griffin.

[identity profile] yumiyoshi.livejournal.com 2012-12-30 07:11 pm (UTC)(link)
Excellent points! (Also way too central London to be Griffin, maybe? As you pointed out, Peter is all downtown, whereas Matthew hangs out in the 'burbs a lot. I can't tell whether the Midnight Mayor only has power over Central or Greater London. Matthew drew an explicit parallel to the Lord Mayor, who only has jurisdiction in the City of London, but he seems to run all over the place. But I guess everyone stays inside the M25, which is all that counts.)

Now that you say it, I think it might partly be that the BBC producers clearly chose very sunny days for the filming, and slapped a bunch of filters on their cameras to boot. Doyle at least had realistic weather XD I was there this past July, and I don't think I ever took my jacket off.

[identity profile] flemmings.livejournal.com 2012-12-30 10:42 pm (UTC)(link)
Matthew gets all over hell's half acre-- hence the map I had to buy that *still* didn't go far enough. The Mayor had to walk the bounds of the City, which is as central as one can get; but I have a feeling that pre-Angels Matthew was far more suburban. He certainly knows all these outlying areas and describes them in distinct and sleazy detail. Or maybe griffin has an eye for garbage that Aaronovitch lacks.

By contrast, Peter's roots are outside central London (I think?), but that's where most of the action is. Thus Peter feels more Holmesian to me than Matthew.

The oddity about London weather is that any time I've been there in summer (and here we're going back to my childhood, when my mad mother dragged all four of us to Europe at 'much too young to be travelling' ages like 5) it's sweltered: blazing sun, breathless heat, indistinguishable in my memory from Rome. But the few sunny days I recall from winter London did look very like Sherlock's sun.
incandescens: (Default)

[personal profile] incandescens 2012-12-30 09:54 pm (UTC)(link)
You do know that Cumberbatch will be voicing Smaug in the Hobbit movies? Though given the pace of the trilogy, we're probably going to have to wait till the third film to actually hear him say anything, or do more than open a meaningful eye.

[identity profile] flemmings.livejournal.com 2012-12-30 10:27 pm (UTC)(link)
No I didn't, in fact, but I'm sure it will be a smugly knowing meaningful eye.

I suppose I'll see The Hobbit eventually, maybe, when I can watch it slow and without 3D glasses. It's not my favourite book of all time, which may make it easier to watch. Only- umm- do the dwarves wash their hair? I couldn't bear to see parts 2&3 of LotR, and it was mostly because of Aragorn and Boromir's greasy hair.
incandescens: (Default)

[personal profile] incandescens 2013-01-01 02:12 pm (UTC)(link)
I went to see the Hobbit in 2D, and have no complaints about the D-ness of it. (Possibly about a few alterations to canon, but that is another matter entirely.) And I can assure you that the dwarves take a great deal of care over their hair.