Entry tags:
The orthographer grows philosophical
Half the time I think going back to the looseness of spelling that Shakespearian (Shaxperian, Shakesperian, Shaksperian, Shaxberdian) English had would be cool, and half the time I think chatspeak and the net have done exactly that and hate it with an unyielding passion. (Pet hates, in no order: to instead of too ('I want one like that to.' To what, is my automatic response); alot as one word; and the apostrophe'd plural: 'many country's are feeling the credit pinch.' Dear god, what *do* they teach them in these schools?)
And in between I have random moments at the front lines, where written English yields to spoken, and am inclined to be charmed by things like 'without more adieu' (no use in long good-byes) and 'waiting on tenderhooks.' Tenderhooks sound rather pleasant, in fact.
And then I think it's just because I'm a suck for a pun, and 'tenderhooks' is quite as bad as 'company's.'
And in between I have random moments at the front lines, where written English yields to spoken, and am inclined to be charmed by things like 'without more adieu' (no use in long good-byes) and 'waiting on tenderhooks.' Tenderhooks sound rather pleasant, in fact.
And then I think it's just because I'm a suck for a pun, and 'tenderhooks' is quite as bad as 'company's.'

no subject
My 18yr old cousin is taking grammar in post secondary... she didn't know what an adverb was. *despairs*
no subject
But then, I didn't really learn much English grammar until I took French in high school. Then I finally learned all the verb tenses by name and function, and so on.
Things that drive me nuts: per say for per se, adding -ed to make something past tense when it doesn't need it (broadcasted).... I know there's more, but I'm blanking.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject