On feedback
I was going to leave a comment on this but I figured I'd be talking off-topic a bit. So I do it here.
I was struck by one person's remark that the fanfic she writes is her personal response to something in the series- her meditation on whatever point it may be. That indeed is what the best of my fic has been- well, maybe not the 'best' by objective standards, but the most satisfying to me personally, to write and to have written.
If you look at fic as a form of commentary, not leaving feedback makes very good sense. It's exactly like an lj entry. I don't expect everyone who reads my journal entries to comment on them; to do so would be taking self-importance to ludicrous extremes. People reply if something strikes them particularly, or if they want to continue discussing some point I've raised. But who'd want to have their whole FL saying 'Interesting comment' or 'Good point' to each entry of theirs? much less to have your readers flog themselves into coming up with a new and innovative remark each time they dutifully comment on one of your posts.
Equally with fic. If someone is utterly bowled over by what I wrote and *has* to tell me, I'm quite happy to hear it. If it provokes some particular thought in them I suppose I'm happy to discuss that as well, so long as the discussion doesn't start edging out the fic-writing as it's wont to do with lazy writers like, y'know, me. (The parallel being when lj posts spark private email responses that are fine as far as they go, but not what a lj is essentially for IMO. Ljs are public, hence I want public discussions in them.)
But the feeling that one *must* say something in response to a fic- and that the writer must then say something back to you- ignores the reality of reading as I at least experience it. Most fics and most lj entries provoke mild and brief-lived interest. Which is fine- I don't want to be stirred to my bowels or struck dumb with admiration every time I look at what someone else has posted in their blog or their fic site. But that perfectly natural response of indifference isn't going to spark heartfelt and meaningful feedback. So why insist that it should?
I don't mind if people's response is the old APA acronym RAEBNC: 'Read and enjoyed but no comment.' Neither do I see any reason why they should bother to tell me that. What does put my teeth on edge is the pat on the head remarks I used to get on MLs- 'fine work', 'good story', 'very nice'- that I can't help feeling come more from someone's desire to appear polite (or even worse, to encourage 'our fine writers' quote-unquote growl) than from any particular belief that it *was* a fine work or very nice. My FL may consider themselves exempt from this for the most part: I generally know whose 'fine work' means exactly that. But from strangers- no. Don't bother. As with ljs, I feel one should only reply to a fic when there's something that needs saying: and that there's nothing wrong or even unusual in having nothing to say to what is, after all, a private meditation.
I was struck by one person's remark that the fanfic she writes is her personal response to something in the series- her meditation on whatever point it may be. That indeed is what the best of my fic has been- well, maybe not the 'best' by objective standards, but the most satisfying to me personally, to write and to have written.
If you look at fic as a form of commentary, not leaving feedback makes very good sense. It's exactly like an lj entry. I don't expect everyone who reads my journal entries to comment on them; to do so would be taking self-importance to ludicrous extremes. People reply if something strikes them particularly, or if they want to continue discussing some point I've raised. But who'd want to have their whole FL saying 'Interesting comment' or 'Good point' to each entry of theirs? much less to have your readers flog themselves into coming up with a new and innovative remark each time they dutifully comment on one of your posts.
Equally with fic. If someone is utterly bowled over by what I wrote and *has* to tell me, I'm quite happy to hear it. If it provokes some particular thought in them I suppose I'm happy to discuss that as well, so long as the discussion doesn't start edging out the fic-writing as it's wont to do with lazy writers like, y'know, me. (The parallel being when lj posts spark private email responses that are fine as far as they go, but not what a lj is essentially for IMO. Ljs are public, hence I want public discussions in them.)
But the feeling that one *must* say something in response to a fic- and that the writer must then say something back to you- ignores the reality of reading as I at least experience it. Most fics and most lj entries provoke mild and brief-lived interest. Which is fine- I don't want to be stirred to my bowels or struck dumb with admiration every time I look at what someone else has posted in their blog or their fic site. But that perfectly natural response of indifference isn't going to spark heartfelt and meaningful feedback. So why insist that it should?
I don't mind if people's response is the old APA acronym RAEBNC: 'Read and enjoyed but no comment.' Neither do I see any reason why they should bother to tell me that. What does put my teeth on edge is the pat on the head remarks I used to get on MLs- 'fine work', 'good story', 'very nice'- that I can't help feeling come more from someone's desire to appear polite (or even worse, to encourage 'our fine writers' quote-unquote growl) than from any particular belief that it *was* a fine work or very nice. My FL may consider themselves exempt from this for the most part: I generally know whose 'fine work' means exactly that. But from strangers- no. Don't bother. As with ljs, I feel one should only reply to a fic when there's something that needs saying: and that there's nothing wrong or even unusual in having nothing to say to what is, after all, a private meditation.
no subject
Reading through her post, I gotta say this part really makes me blink.
It is, in fact, a clearer indication of your disinterest than leaving no comment at all, because it implies that you had the time to read both the fic and the comments, and that you even had the time to post a comment, but when it came right down to it, you found the icon more worthy. Ouch, right? Yeah.
I really want to ask her, what if you read or skimmed the fic, decided you didn't like it or it wasn't well written or it wasn't your cup of tea, would she still want the person to comment and say as much? A lot of people subscribe to the whole "If you don't have anything nice to say..." rule.
no subject
no subject
I do see where she gets the "rude" factor from the OTness of icon squee but that probably has more to do with the egocentric nature of blogs in general (and the fact that she'd rather them talk about her on her livejournal, which is understandable.) And yeah, yeah some commenters probably should get a room instead of flooding the inboxes of the OP without really thinking of it. But I think that's more of a YMMV thing than anything else. The more I look at this the more I think, hasn't this been done? Hasn't everyone and their brother gone through this at some point in time?
no subject
And. Okay. I did also say in my post that I don't think it is a reader's obligation to leave feedback (only that I really appreciate it when they do). And I also said that I appreciated critical comments as much or even more than strictly positive ones. So I guess I wanted to clear up a *few* things. :) I have no problem with you (or anyone) disagreeing with me. I just prefer you disagree with something I actually *said*.
no subject
If I post my grocery shopping list, I don't -want- to see a string of "Go, girl! Broccoli GETTO!" Nooo. Hence comments disabled when I dun wun discuss nuffin', thks vry mch.
Same with the fanfic, really. I admit that I'm curious about why people read 'em, under the circs (esp. if they survived all the way to the end). But not necessarily about what they thought of what they'd read. ('Cause I can beat myself up sans assistance. :P) So I'm not into joining the beggin' and bitchin' and blackmailin' for feedback scene.
Related: I'd made a comment once upon a time about not wanting to get the pity feedback -- in fact, it was in your LJ! At that time, it seemed to me that everyone was arguing that there was no such thing as "pity feedback." I still don't think that's the case; I also think that's what you're describing here with the fine-story very-nice (etc.).
Anyhoo. I was awfully amused by that post; it apparently was kicked off by that poll in another LJ, the one where all and sundry were venting about the vile people who'll leave LJ comments unrelated to "Praise Ye My Glorious Fanfic/Fanart." And these people even start chatting with people who aren't the owner of the LJ! And they chat about things that have nothing to do with the fanfic!
Hmm. People do that chez moi all the time. I'll try to work time into my schedule to care about it, then the butt-kicking will commence! For no one seems to be properly acknowledging that my LJ must be dedicated only to the worship of me. (What's wrong with you people?)
no subject
Saw a certain chronic-offender fan throw a shitfit once when someone had the 'rudeness' to answer the fandom-related question another someone had thrown out in a comments thread. '*My* livejournal! *I* do the talking here! Learn your place, peasant scum!'
One doesn't want to be ignored in one's own lj, of course, but I can't see any sane person wanting it to be Egoboo Central either. I guess I see lj as an open house where my friends drop in to chat. A good hostess is always pleased when her guests get along and start talking to each other
and she can get on with making dinner.no subject
*nodnodnod*
Seriously tho. Queen for a Day strikes me as having a -healthier- approach to this than all those women who are sitting about stewing over it silently. They obviously feel the exact same way as her, but they're too busy being "nice" about it and cultivating ulcers.
(Me, I think there's a diff btwn people who're being deliberately trollish in one's LJ and those who are just . . . well, heedless and hanging about in the area. Which doesn't bother me. Else I, like La Reine, would likely kick 'em to the curb.)
Fine, as long as it's dinner for me. /divano subject
Queen for a Day may lack ulcers (though that's not always true, by the by) but she's also going to lack friends- as opposed to co-dependents and toadies, say.
And anyway, if someone is polite and civil how do you /know/ that she's stewing inwardly about whatever it is- people talking in her comments or no one commenting on her fics? Negative evidence cuts both ways.
no subject
no subject
Still y'now, it occurs to me that feelings about feedback are one of those things people have to work through, the way they do how much Japanese is too much and how to distinguish two people in a sex scene when both are he. They think they want feedback, then they realize they don't want certain kinds, then they realize that it's not all useful, and occasionally they realize that it's pure poison. A process thing, really. Accompanied by much wailing and moping at each stage, but such is a writer's natural state. *Anything* to avoid actually *writing*, after all.
no subject
I like the off-topic (where the topic is me ^^;) chatting! Or I would not have lurked on mailing lists for years. Lj-wise it makes up for the current resounding silences/spam on my mls. ;_; I just need to get over my compulsion to reply to everyone and everything.
Though I did get one icon-love comment directed to someone else once, that was only wtf because I had nooo idea whatsoever where the person came from or why, since I don't generally post on communities or comment in high-traffic ljs. (Avoiding communities is a good way not to get weird and irrelevant visitors most of the time, if it is a concern for them.)
(sorry for spam, lj keeps doing the error and unthreading of replies thing.)
no subject
Maybe I caught it from you. Yep, blame shifting, always a Good Thing . . .
I do get the odd anonymouses sometimes. I assume they're from people on my block list, so I just ignore 'em.
Comment below has strongly brought to mind You Know Who and her online publishing endevors. ^__^
no subject
Don't think I do, really. Which of many?
no subject
no subject
I have fled the country. I do not know who anymore! ^__^ Gah, that was stressful while it lasted. ^^;
no subject
But that means you can't keep me updated on the
funnygrievous woe anymore.no subject
no subject
no subject
Spam!
Re: Spam!
Re: Spam!
no subject
no subject
no subject
I mean, it's nice to get comments, especially from people you'd like to hear from, but then, it's not good to be "I'm the SUN. Revolve around ME." It's a hard balancing act, I guess.
There's the issue also that some people don't leave feedback because they don't like the actual act of writing feedback.
A weird thing about posting a story and no one comments, it's like it's gone into the ether, and you have no idea if it actually exists outside of your own view of it. (Of course, anything online does exist.) Sometimes "good work" = "I saw this", and for some people that's good enough. For others, it's not.
no subject
And that's why I also have small problems with the assumed 'everything online not locked up is potential public property' and liable to linking by people like f_w and metafandom. That's the legal approach; it's not one that recognizes the emotional gestalt of a situation aka civility. If a post was meant for a person's usual audience of friends, should you make it accessible to an unfamiliar and hostile public? Yes yes I know one has a *right* to do that, but that particular western shibboleth is beginning to get on my nerves. 'You was within your rights, sir, but was you within your duty?' (quoting Kipling without book here.)
I agree, the short comment does equal recognition- RAEBNC. Someone did read it, it didn't just whizz past everyone's heads, oh good. But as people say, you never know. Maybe it will make the writer happy; maybe it will infuriate her. Even silence isn't safe as a response- why don't you comment?????- but silence is easiest.
no subject
Mmm, and I've been thinking about that lately . . .
I mean, both FFnet and Ficwad provide hit counters now. They tell you how many times people've smacked those links. So . . .
You get this warped perspective: You wind up with fanfic with over a hundred page views but zero comments (and, in the case of Ficward, no rating to speak of either). It feels like hopping the fast-track to a novel sort of psychological complex. I think the state of ether and apathy was better in some ways.
no subject
Ah, them hit counters. Are very mysterious mysteries. A bunch seem to have started quietly ticking away while I wasn't looking and I'm all who's reading what now why?
Ether and apathy have their appeal... (you have this really squicksome review on your MLR outing. ^^;)
no subject
Anyway, yeah, I've found that they cause one to bounce over the mjj feedback spectrum. I.e., it's all about the apathy until you eye those counters. Then abruptly you shift into unsettled Caring Mode (and caring about what precisely? I don't knooow), then you settle back into comfy apathy again.
It's just that . . . if there really *is* a population in the teeny-tiny fandoms, it'd be nice if they'd use the comment feature for nonspecific fannishness squeeing, if nothing else. 'Cause it gets a bit lonesome, out on the range . . .
(You mean the 'Hey, read my rapefic!' girl? Um. Indeed. Self-advertising at its weirdest.)
no subject
no subject
Hnn. Thing is, Ficward in particular adds an extra flavor of squirrel to this stew. They've a one-click system where anyone can anonymously indicate approval (or disapproval) -- yet hardly anyone uses it. So you'll get situations where you've 110 hits on something, yet only 2 clicks' worth of any response.
You can't help but wonder about those 108 others. Then you wonder at yourself for wondering. Squirrel on a wheel time!
In other words, what -seems- like a nice idea in theory smacks into the wall of typical fan behavior and goes splat. So I find the ffnet system where it's either tap out a review or move on to be better. (If only ffnet didn't have the other issues, alas.)
no subject
So equally when I'm tempted to do the squirrel cage thing Ohhh my stuff sucks, the world doesn't spaniel all over it, I'm not a BNFW, I'm not the first person people rec in my fandom boo-hoo-hoo the little voice says Whose fics *does* the world spaniel over these days? and provides a short list of names. So, ya wanna be in that league? No. No, emphatically not. I want to be esteemed by the discriminating. (looks around at present company) Oh, guess I am. Win-win, like I say.
The only thing reality checks don't help with is when people are genuinely better writers. I want to write as well as afrai (and I want to be her age again too. Or, well, maybe not) and I don't. Dommage. Or boo-hoo-hoo, depending on hormones.
no subject
Fanfic? That's artistic product. I spent some time crafting it, I wrote it for an audience, and I'm not just posting it for my health -- if all I cared about was some kind of personal satisfaction, it wouldn't leave my computer. Once it's out in the wide world, I don't content myself with the knowledge that "someone somewhere might have read it," just like 99% of artists don't. Writers watch their sales, artists hope for big gallery openings, actors and musicians want good notices, etc. etc. etc. Feedback is the fandom equivalent of reviews, and yes, it means more coming from your friends or people you respect. And yes, there's some ego tied up with that, but that's kind of the deal with creative people.
I'm really, really confused why such a long-standing community tradition as feedback is coming under fire these days, esp. because it's a nice thing. Arguing about concrit is one thing, but why discourage folks from leaving compliments?