Ahh, soo ieba..

[flemmings]

Oh yes. daegaer's last entry reminds me that I had a dream last night where the 60s Beatles, all clean mop-haired youths, were assassins of a particularly unpleasant kind, and being clean mop-haired youths, wanted to stop being assassins. Except for John, as nasty a bit of goods as ever, who manipulated/ terrified them all into continuing the murders.

Comments

[tammylee.livejournal.com]

This concept fires my imagination up!
Love it!

[i-am-zan.livejournal.com]

hmmm there seems to be an outflowing of dreams on my list lately which I find really interesting. Its been rare lately that I remember my dreams let alone remember that I *have dreamt* even though I think I know I have, if that makes sense.

I would love to recall my dreams just to see what they're like/about these days.

But that, that sounds like it needs to be ficced or something.

[doire]

Are you sure this isn't a minor Beatles' film?

mm, punctuation quandary. Is "Beatles" singular or plural? It ends in an "s". Is even a possessive? Decides to post and runaway.

[petronia.livejournal.com]

Hahahaha~

I went to the John & Yoko exhibition a while back, and major reaction was Wow, this guy knew what he was doing, but he was such a douchebag!!!

[flemmings.livejournal.com]

Quite sure. John wouldn't have allowed himself to have been presented as he was in the film.

Plural, I believe. The Beatles are... The Beatles were, but 'Abba is.' Singing groups seem to be plural if the name is.

The possessive is the same as anyone who ends in s- for choice, Beatles' and Charles', though Beatles's and Charles's is allowed.

[flemmings.livejournal.com]

Without being able to name any one single douchey thing he did (his treatment of Cynthia I put down to youth, zeitgeist, and sudden fame), I always had the impression that a douchebag was exactly what he was. A beautiful douchebag, quand-meme.